Reviving the Diaphragm

By Jessica Gilbey

080000-diaphragmIn light of the recent French ban on the contraceptive pill Diane 35, following four deaths in the past twenty five years and the safety alert issued by The Therapeutic Goods Administration, it seems an appropriate time to rethink the available contraceptive methods and their associated risks. Oral contraceptives are known to increase the risk of some cancers[i], venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular diseases. Those are only a few of the most frightening in a long list of hazards. I think there is room here for a skit involving a Steve Irwin impersonator wrangling with a hefty pamphlet of contraceptive related health risks.

Since proudly (re)discovering the diaphragm, considering myself some kind of birth control archaeologist delving into the profane purses of eighties cult movies, it has puzzled me as to why so few women choose it and healthcare professionals are reticent in suggesting it to patients searching for contraceptive options. The diaphragm was invented in 1842, which makes it one of the oldest methods of contraception. Could this still be dusted off and utilised as a viable method today? What could be better than a safe sex solution that furnishes feminine control without necessitating/negotiating the partner’s potential permission, knowledge or cooperation, doesn’t interfere with a woman’s menstrual cycle or long-term fertility and has no dangerous side effects such as other conventional forms of contraception, provided it is used correctly?

Aesthetically speaking, the diaphragm is coolly understated, retro and comes complete with pink ‘Polly Pocket’ style case. Additionally, it isn’t detectable, doesn’t affect sensitivity for either partner and can conveniently be used during menstruation and double as a ‘moon cup’ or catching mechanism that can be emptied when needed, effectively replacing tampons or pads. It can be washed and reused over and over again and lasts for up to two years.

Some might be dubious about the efficacy of the diaphragm in preventing pregnancy. As with any method, consulting a family health planning clinic physician is important when choosing contraception and it is the only way to learn how to insert the diaphragm and have it correctly fitted. The diaphragm works by careful insertion into the vagina before sex, where it provides a barrier preventing sperm from entering the cervix. With perfect use (which means that the diaphragm is used consistently and correctly) the pregnancy rates are quite low and a study published in the International Reproductive Health Journal in 2001 found the cumulative pregnancy rate to be 10.1 per 100 women, which was on the low end of previous studies of the diaphragm, and this compared favourably to the pregnancy rates taken for oral contraceptives and intrauterine devices. As with any barrier method, there is little protection against most STDs, thought there is substantial evidence that protecting the cervix can reduce the risk of contracting HIV and other STDS. Of course, this is a more likely option for those who are considering other non-STD protective avenues, but wish to take advantage of a safe alternative to other methods.

Instead of fecklessly opening a pill packet and overlooking the weighty wad of side-effects and health hazards, we should at least refuse to click ‘okay’ without carefully considering the facts and instead seek out the supply of safe, convenient and cervically commendable contraceptive alternatives such as the humble diaphragm, whose only flaw is that it could probably use a little rebranding.

[i] Women who use oral contraceptives have an increased risk of breast cancer, cervical cancer and benign liver tumours, but reduced risks of ovarian and endometrial cancer.

This entry was posted in Original comment/article by MsElouise. Bookmark the permalink.

About MsElouise

MsElouise is a community programs worker and feminist from Melbourne Australia. She likes to travel, write, rant and make people feel uncomfortable about their assumptions. She hopes to one day be remembered for changing the world just a little bit. Right now she does this by proving that teenage girls are a higher order of beings.

15 thoughts on “Reviving the Diaphragm

  1. Pingback: It isn’t a Polly Pocket! | Poetrianais

  2. What a great article! I too am anti the pill – since it left me with two tumors in my liver, one the size of a tenis ball. After visiting two specialists who wanted to get all knife happy and cut 2/3 of my liver away I finally found a specialist who told me to shock horror stop taking the pill. He said not only was it responsible for my tumours but also for the mass fertility problems women of today are experiencing. Since then I’ve tried IUD’s – yes you can feel them – dont believe the non cervix beholding male doctors, the injection – hello spotting and finally the nuva ring which I quite like. Anyhoo I will ask my doctor about the diaphragm as I’d much prefer to be 100% chemical free.

  3. Yeah, but perfect use is tough for a diaphragm. I haven’t used one (IUD here) but I guess you’d have to excuse yourself every time you were about to have unplanned sex?

    • I would have to say that if you’re not in a position to feel comfortable interrupting sex to talk about contraception including inserting/consuming/assisting with contraception then there are more concerns than excusing yourself?

      • Sure, but I love knowing that I am ready to go whenever the mood takes me (and my partner). Obviously, it comes down to the user’s choice and I don’t think the diaphragm would work for me.

      • anyway, definitely no offence meant to the ladies who prefer to use a diaphragm. How frustrating that contraception is still perceived as being “on us”, by the way.

      • Absolutely. Contraception is all about choice and what works for every individual and couple. I guess my comment was more coming from my place as an educator who teaches that the first and most important part of sex is communication and that if there’s discomfort around contraceptive use that needs to be discussed.

  4. Thank you so much for sharing your story, BeeBee. It it is a terrible thing that you had to go through such trauma as a result of seemingly harmless yet malevolent contraceptive methods. May you heal swiftly and joyfully. x

  5. Hello canbebitter,

    I wondered the same thing at first. However, you can keep a diaphragm inserted for up to 24 hours, taking it out to wash and re-insert. This means that you could leave it in on the occasion you think sex might be a possibility with no need to race off ‘last minute’.

  6. Glad to see the revival of the diaphragm, and to see more people talking about it! I wrote a similar post for Ms. about three years ago: Where’d the Diaphragm Disappear To?. The diaphragm was my birth control method for 15 years, and I never had even a pregnancy scare. Perfect use wasn’t that tough.

    To echo poetrianais above, there’s no need to excuse oneself and race off to insert a diaphragm, as it can be inserted hours or moments before intercourse. Plus, I always kept it in the drawer of my nightstand, within easy reach from the bed.

  7. I’ve been using a diaphragm for years – successfully – trouble is you can’t buy them any more and I’m due a replacement! Much better than drugs….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s