5 ways in which domestic chores assigned to women are romanticized
6 minutes read
One of the ways in which gender equality is reflected in marriages is the equal division of household chores between partners. In the context of a changing society, more and more women are embracing careers and this has greatly contributed to the dismantling of the sacrosanct model of the patriarchate of “breadwinner” housework.
However, women continue to bear disproportionately the burden of household activities, even though their roles have changed from the traditional molds of housekeeping and care. It just means that “choiceâFor women in terms of work and income comes the cost of continuing to also manage the household in heterosexual partnerships. Their foray outside the domestic space is therefore subject to overcompensation, including the performance of activities that allow adherence to traditional and heteronormative gender roles.
The notions of care and care are intimately linked to the performance of domestic tasks, both of which constitute socio-cultural connotations of “”wife” and or “maternal“functions. This discourse strengthens, perpetuates and normalizes women who take on a greater share of domestic work, compared to their male counterparts. Here are five ways in which domestic work assigned to women is romanticized and therefore normalized as exclusively work. intended to be carried out by them:
1. Women are inherent nurturers
The debate over dismantling the gender norm that women take care of the domestic sphere has also sparked debates over the deconstruction of the concept of domestic work as “life skill“, not a”gender roleâ. However, for men who perform household chores, the ‘FunctionalityIs at the forefront of their performance. For women, on the other hand, socio-cultural and historical accounts of gender expectations have cultivated the image of a caregiver, the pinnacle of care, for whom motivation to do domestic work derives primarily from caregiving and caregiving. valuing the emotional needs and well-being of others. be on his own.
2. Only Maa can cook such delicious food
Women cooking for their children is an act that has been timelessly peddled as âPyaar se banaya hua khanaâ, “maa ke saath ka khana”. It is not simple statements but reinforcements of gender ideals that place domestic work at the center of the duties of the wife and / or mother. The intertwining of domestic work with sentimental value is a link forged only between women and domestic work, which is indicative of the gendered notions of the task. Let us also recall the photograph of a woman cooking for the family with an oxygen concentrator attached may she be glorified as “mother’s unconditional love“.
3. Women are happy to give, their patience is their strength
Women are relentlessly portrayed as deriving happiness and fulfilling their emotional needs by doing work for family members. Tying a woman’s self-esteem to the way she does domestic care work is to romanticize the notion of emotional work more. This narrative continues to erase his value as an autonomous individual for someone who only exists in relation to others. The gender stereotype that women should smile more is also embedded in this idea. A woman should shine constantly even while dragging herself around the house without help.
Flaunting her disappointment or even frowning while performing these tasks herself makes her the target of harsh criticism not only from men but also from women, as it goes against the grain. the social construction of the patient and sacrificial housewife, happiest only when her family approves of her work. .
Read also : Are mothers machines? A review of the questioning about motherhood
4. Women are multitasking super humans
Women who choose to work are not easily encouraged and motivated to do the same. Their worth and dignity continue to be linked to their role as mother or wife. No matter how well they excel at work, in the end their worth and respect is determined by how well they fulfill gendered domestic roles.
In addition, for most women, being able to work requires continuing to perform domestic chores and adhere to the patriarchal ideals of wife and motherhood. As a result, women overcompensate not only by managing their careers, but by working too much at home. That’s what we call “fixâWork, in which, toâcorrect“their”detourâGender expectations, women overcompensate by conforming to traditional gender roles. This situation is romanticized and normalized by society by handing out trophies to women overworked to be “multitask“and”Super woman“.
5. A woman is the glue that unites a family
Domestic work being the prerequisite for being a “goodâMother or wife, women who have a career suffer from immense guilt for not putting in enough effort at home while their male counterparts do not have such problems. Social conditioning is at the heart of this guilt followed by a rebuke for making a career. Subsequently, problems in the household are conveniently attributed to the fact that the housekeeper is absent or is simply not present full time. The woman being the “glue“who keeps the family together, his”choice“to do something for herself in terms of career, is confusing for many first of all because she has chosen herself, and secondly, because she has”lackâThe family. This attitude that the woman is the one who keeps the family together is another trope to ensure that women remain slaves to unbalanced family structures.
Read also : Can an unequal marriage be the foundation of a family?
Caregiving has always been associated with women and it carries with it the reinforcement of gendered ideals. Nurses, teachers, nannies, and housekeepers are the careers most often chosen by women, as women are believed to be best suited to these profiles, due to the common misconception that providing care and support. care are “”biological data“for women. So while career opportunities for women are sporadic, they are even more limited and filtered by the” “feminineâLens. In this vein, motherhood is also a glorified gender ideal, and men who want to stay at home as partners are frowned upon, not only because it goes against the heteronormative model of the male breadwinner, but also because that men are assigned to be emotionless and therefore, domestic duties performed by men can tarnish the prestige of the “ideal” family.
Pigeon sank into the expectations of the patriarchy regarding gender roles, the idea of ââ”self-careâFor women also has its roots in feminist movements. The heart of the concept is to assess your own emotional and physical needs. To be “selfishâAnd to choose oneself then, was a radical movement that upset the dominant narrative of women who tirelessly and indulgently care for the family. With the booming cosmetics industry, patriarchal beauty ideals and the iron grip of capitalism, “self-careâIs now reduced to marketing strategies attempting to sell cosmetics and reducing self-care toâgood skinâ. While women subscribe to the notion of self-care in this reductive way, they still succumb to the ideals of “perfectâWife or mother, who is the epitome of sacrifice.
By viewing “accountability“In a unilinear fashion, which simply weaves a link between financial stability and the empowerment of women, we”disempowerâWomen by eliminating underlying inequalities. We fail to recognize the socio-cultural conditioning which is an invisible force limiting true empowerment when we continue to romanticize the performance of household chores by women. It is high time to separate domestic work from notions of motherhood and the duties of a wife, and to see the same through a functional lens as we gladly do in the case of men. Women are not homogeneous multitasking, but human beings who are forced to do more work to be respected and accepted.
Love, care, caring, through acts of service, can be viewed in a non-sexist way as “love“and”care“And not necessarily” feminine “, since it is accompanied by a massive baggage, which women have timelessly supported.