Reggaeton women do feminism on their terms
China Morning Post
Huawei’s Meng Wanzhou Wins Offer to Delay Extradition Hearing by Three Months, Shaking Marathon Case
Huawei Technologies CEO Meng Wanzhou has won a request to adjourn her Canadian extradition case for more than three months in light of new evidence from HSBC bank, which has turned the timeline of the case upside down already a marathon. The final phase of the legal battle, which lasted 28 months and rocked China’s relations with Canada and the United States, was due to begin next week. But Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes ruled in the B.C. Supreme Court on Wednesday that Meng’s offer to adjourn the case should be granted so that the defense can review any bank documents it deems relevant. Meng’s attorneys said on Monday that some of the documents had already been provided by HSBC, with more expected to be delivered within the next six weeks. Do you have questions on the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new curated content platform with explanations, FAQs, analysis and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team. Holmes has canceled three weeks of court hearings scheduled for April 26 to May 14. She ordered their reprogramming on or around August 3. The decision blurs the end of the case. Holmes, Meng’s attorneys and Canadian government attorneys representing U.S. interests will hold a conference on April 28 to chart a new course forward. In his brief oral ruling, which included no reason for the decision, Holmes said new claims resulting from HSBC’s evidence should be filed by August 3. Meng Wanzhou calls for three-month delay in marathon extradition case HSBC agreed to hand over documents to Meng – who is Huawei’s chief financial officer and the daughter of company founder Ren Zhengfei – after settling a case with she before the High Court of Hong Kong. Previously, HSBC had rejected another claim for return of the material in UK courts. Senior attorney for the Canadian Department of Justice Robert Frater said it was “inexplicable” that HSBC had acquiesced to Meng in Hong Kong, considering that the bank had “won on all counts” in the UK case. Frater, whose team opposed the request, had characterized Meng as embarking on a global fishing expedition for evidence that had no place in the Canadian extradition hearing and should instead be presented. at an American trial. But Meng’s attorneys had claimed that the HSBC documents could support their claim that US authorities had deceived the Canadian court, and Meng’s extradition should therefore be dismissed. Meng is accused by US authorities of defrauding HSBC by lying to the bank about Huawei’s business dealings in Iran, putting the bank at risk of violating US sanctions. She was arrested at the Vancouver airport on December 1, 2018 and has since fought a US extradition request to stand trial in New York. His treatment infuriated Beijing. According to Meng’s lawyers, the new HSBC material is tied to the relationship between Huawei and HSBC and two subsidiaries – Skycom, through which Huawei did business in Iran, and a shell company called Canicula. Meng’s attorney, Richard Peck, said on Monday that the material would be “plentiful,” but nothing was made public. His unfamiliar character apparently dismayed Frater, who had told Holmes, “They don’t know what’s in these documents and they don’t know when they’re going to get them.” HSBC and Huawei’s Meng Wanzhou settle Hong Kong file seeking documents The timeline for the case has been tightly calibrated and is the subject of much negotiation between the government, which is seeking to rush the process, and the Meng, apparently happy to extend them. Peck had denied that Meng was “trying to tie this up”; the adjournment was a matter of fundamental fairness, he had said. The government’s written response to the request, however, had castigated the request. “Two and a half years after the start of this procedure, countless hours spent working out a timetable agreed to by both parties, and just a few days after reaching the finish line, the petitioner asks this tribunal to make a decision. break of several months, ”he said. In court on Monday, Frater said “there is literally no basis for this request … they are asking again that this court be transformed into a court of first instance”. But Holmes disagreed. The two sides will now try to chart the rest of the complicated case, which involves some of Canada’s leading defense and government lawyers, negotiating travel restrictions in the event of a pandemic on both sides of the country with a mix of ‘in-person, video and telephone hearings. Meng will be awaiting the resumption of her business under partial house arrest at her C $ 13.7 million (US $ 11 million) home, one of two homes she owns in Vancouver. In the days following his arrest, Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor were detained in China and charged with espionage. Last month, they endured closed-door trials that each lasted only a few hours; no verdict has been announced. The Government of Canada claims Kovrig and Spavor are victims of hostage diplomacy and has called for their release. China, meanwhile, has repeatedly called on Canada to release Meng, categorizing his arrest in similar terms. minister, must decide whether US has jurisdiction over Meng Wanzhou’s actions in Hong Kong Meng Wanzhou’s extradition judge should not rule on US jurisdiction, Canadian government lawyer HSBC said and Huawei’s Meng Wanzhou settle Hong Kong case for documents as she fights extradition Meng Wanzhou’s lawyer denounces ex-Mountie for This article, Huawei’s Meng Wanzhou wins bid to delay the extradition hearing for three months, throwing the marathon case into turmoil for the first time in the South China Morning Post. For the latest news from the South China Morning Post, download our mobile app. Copyright 2021.